GP4+++

allright then,stop punishing gp4 because it is after all the best f1 sim there is around. I have played f12000(what a joke),f1 2001(not even close),f12002(it is better,but weather effects are awful if a compare to gp4). ,gp3 was dissapointing i admit that. And those losers who cant get their wheel configured in gp4,i have microsoft ff wheel and it is working perfect(yeah split axis and everything.) Sorry about my bad english... H�kkinen rules ok.

> And those losers who cant get their wheel configured in gp4,i have microsoft > ff wheel and it is working perfect(yeah split axis and everything.) > Sorry about my bad english... >I'm sorry about your bad trolling. Hakkinen..LOL Whooooooooo??????????

"Paz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:w8HS8.2683$[email hidden]... > allright then,stop punishing gp4 because it is after all the best f1 sim > there is around. A lot of people would argue otherwise. Doug

I FULLY AGREE !!! I have GP4 & F12002 and GP4 is much much better imho. I'm aware of the shortcomings but overall it pleases me a lot more. It even runs in full detail on a modest 1400 XP+ with a GF4 on 1280*1024 The Sauce

"TenInch37" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:7uMS8.1049$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (9 lines)

> I FULLY AGREE !!! > > I have GP4 & F12002 and GP4 is much much better imho. > I'm aware of the shortcomings but overall it pleases me a lot more. > > It even runs in full detail on a modest 1400 XP+ with a GF4 on 1280*1024 > > The Sauce >

Dude, an Athlon XP CPU, and a GF4 are not exactly modest PC's IMO (especially if your GF4 is not an MX series).

"TenInch37" <[email hidden]> wrote: >I FULLY AGREE !!! > >I have GP4 & F12002 and GP4 is much much better imho. >I'm aware of the shortcomings but overall it pleases me a lot more. > >It even runs in full detail on a modest 1400 XP+ with a GF4 on 1280*1024 You call that modest? That is really friggin' close to the top end in my book. Fred

Steve <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws z9ZS8.679$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (14 lines)

> > "TenInch37" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:7uMS8.1049$[email hidden]... > > I FULLY AGREE !!! > > > > I have GP4 & F12002 and GP4 is much much better imho. > > I'm aware of the shortcomings but overall it pleases me a lot more. > > > > It even runs in full detail on a modest 1400 XP+ with a GF4 on 1280*1024 > > > > The Sauce > > > Dude, an Athlon XP CPU, and a GF4 are not exactly modest PC's IMO > (especially if your GF4 is not an MX series).

It's a 4400 TI ;-)

"TenInch37" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:F30T8.1859$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (12 lines)

> > Steve <[email hidden]> schreef in berichtnieuws > z9ZS8.679$[email hidden]... > > > > "TenInch37" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > > news:7uMS8.1049$[email hidden]... > > > I FULLY AGREE !!! > > > > > > I have GP4 & F12002 and GP4 is much much better imho. > > > I'm aware of the shortcomings but overall it pleases me a lot more. > > > > > > It even runs in full detail on a modest 1400 XP+ with a GF4 on

1280*1024

Quoted text (8 lines)

> > > > > > The Sauce > > > > > Dude, an Athlon XP CPU, and a GF4 are not exactly modest PC's IMO > > (especially if your GF4 is not an MX series). > > It's a 4400 TI ;-) >

Sorry to tell you this, but your PC is not what I would classify as a "modest" PC.

What are you smokin' son?? "Paz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:w8HS8.2683$[email hidden]... > allright then,stop punishing gp4 because it is after all the best f1 sim > there is around. > I have played f12000(what a joke),f1 2001(not even close),f12002(it is > better,but weather effects are awful if a compare to gp4). > ,gp3 was dissapointing i admit that. > And those losers who cant get their wheel configured in gp4,i havemicrosoft > ff wheel and it is working perfect(yeah split axis and everything.) > Sorry about my bad english... > > H�kkinen rules ok. > >

Maybe I need a new computer, but what gets me most about GP4 is the lack of "speed sensation". The only time it seems I am going more than about 30 mph (even when the speedometer says 200) is when I run it without any cockpit. I'm not talking about bad frame rate here, just how slow it feels I'm moving through space. This is especially noticeable after playing F1 2002. Anyone else notice this? Todd "Paz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:w8HS8.2683$[email hidden]... > allright then,stop punishing gp4 because it is after all the best f1 sim > there is around. > I have played f12000(what a joke),f1 2001(not even close),f12002(it is > better,but weather effects are awful if a compare to gp4). > ,gp3 was dissapointing i admit that. > And those losers who cant get their wheel configured in gp4,i havemicrosoft > ff wheel and it is working perfect(yeah split axis and everything.) > Sorry about my bad english... > > H�kkinen rules ok. > >

On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:13:05 -0400, "Todd Sorensen" <[email hidden]> wrote: >What are you smokin' son?? Perhaps the last sentence about a certain non-driving Finnish driver gave it all away. ;)

Quoted text (16 lines)

>"Paz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >news:w8HS8.2683$[email hidden]... >> allright then,stop punishing gp4 because it is after all the best f1 sim >> there is around. >> I have played f12000(what a joke),f1 2001(not even close),f12002(it is >> better,but weather effects are awful if a compare to gp4). >> ,gp3 was dissapointing i admit that. >> And those losers who cant get their wheel configured in gp4,i have >microsoft >> ff wheel and it is working perfect(yeah split axis and everything.) >> Sorry about my bad english... >> >> H�kkinen rules ok. >> >> >

Ruud van Gaal Free car sim: http://www.racer.nl/ Pencil art : http://www.marketgraph.nl/gallery/

Douglas Ellison wrote:

Quoted text (8 lines)

> "Paz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:w8HS8.2683$[email hidden]... > >>allright then,stop punishing gp4 because it is after all the best f1 sim >>there is around. >> > > A lot of people would argue otherwise.

And we know, the majority is always right... ;^P -- l8er ronny Your mouse has moved. Windows must be restarted for the change to take effect. Reboot now?

In article <w8HS8.2683$[email hidden]>, "Paz" <[email hidden]> writes: >Sorry about my bad english... > >H�kkinen rules ok. Hakkinen? Who's HE? <g> Eldred -- Homepage - http://www.umich.edu/~epickett Never argue with an idiot. He brings you down to his level, then beats you with experience... Remove SPAM-OFF to reply.

missing "Speed sensation"?? ME TOO!!! Until.... try this: I have a AMD 2100XP, 512RAM, GF4ti4600,.... still sleeping behind wheel.... UNTIL I set GP4 to 1024x, ON: TV - cockpit - mirrors, ALL advanced graphics options to highest (except shadows to 'low' -no loss).... sounds tough right? then I set frame rate to 22.. that was the kicker! Your eye/brain only needs 20-22 fps to percieve fluid motion, let the game play at 22, even if your machine can peak at 29-30 like mine does (P.S. $400 GF4-4600 later just to play GP4). ----- AAARRGHHH $400!!! I also tried it on my GF2-64MB, AMD 1900XP, 256RAM.... all I had to do was lower a few graphic options (AND KEEP THE GAME'S FRAME RATE AT 22 -or less, 19 min.) and everything worked great! -Really! TIP #1 #1 #1 If you can turn off AA, the frame rate increases by 50-70% depending on your card. Yes, looks better w/AA, but do you want to play or not?? L8R -KW "Todd Sorensen" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<afijsn$em825$[email hidden]>... > Maybe I need a new computer, but what gets me most about GP4 is the lack of > "speed sensation". The only time it seems I am going more than about 30 mph > (even when the speedometer says 200) is when I run it without any cockpit. > I'm not talking about bad frame rate here, just how slow it feels I'm > moving through space. This is especially noticeable after playing F1 2002. >

> H�kkinen rules ok. I believe he abdicated... MS > >