Anyone look at some of the times posted on this?
I am a mere mortal, but c'mon, something smells of fish! Hard to believe I
can be a whole second slower, especially on a 1/2 mile short track
etc....guess it doesnt really matter in the big scheme of things, I just
wonder if anyone else looks at some of the posted times with raised eyebrows
as I do?l....it would be different if it were say
"The Ring" or Rouen"..........but I digress......as you were...........
Greg31
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:32:10 GMT, "Greg31" <greg31@.NOSPAM.com> wrote:
Which tracks, and what sort of times?
The only ones that are mindblowing are the superspeedways, since the
times posted are nearly a second faster than the AI at 110%.
Jason
Quoted text (7 lines)
>Anyone look at some of the times posted on this? >I am a mere mortal, but c'mon, something smells of fish! Hard to believe I >can be a whole second slower, especially on a 1/2 mile short track >etc....guess it doesnt really matter in the big scheme of things, I just >wonder if anyone else looks at some of the posted times with raised eyebrows >as I do?l....it would be different if it were say >"The Ring" or Rouen"..........but I digress......as you were...........
> The only ones that are mindblowing are the superspeedways, since the
> times posted are nearly a second faster than the AI at 110%.
so you get a nice draft from the AI at 110 and you got a record :D
Doug
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 00:50:08 +0100, "Doug Ellison"
<[email hidden]> wrote:
>so you get a nice draft from the AI at 110 and you got a record :D
I've set the AI to 110% and passed 5-6 cars on one lap and still
didn't get the record. =)
I tried lowering the AI's drag after that but it was impossible to
keep up at anything below the default setting.
Jason
