Seven black American terrorists attempt to destroy Sears Tower

I don't understand how invading Iraq did not scare these guys into not attacking us. Mitch said it would.

>I don't understand how invading Iraq did not scare these guys into not >attacking us. Mitch said it would. Any chance you could just fuck off ? Please ? Like you promised . Troll

Any chance you could just *** off ? Please ? Like you promised . Troll

redTed wrote:

Quoted text (7 lines)

>> I don't understand how invading Iraq did not scare these guys into not >> attacking us. Mitch said it would. > > Any chance you could just fuck off ? Please ? Like you promised . > Troll > >

I see that you cannot answer the question.

Quoted text (7 lines)

> redTed wrote: >>> I don't understand how invading Iraq did not scare these guys into not >>> attacking us. Mitch said it would. >> >> Any chance you could just fuck off ? Please ? Like you promised . >> Troll > I see that you cannot answer the question.

You fucking retard...you never asked a question ! LOL. Next. McMurphy: Is that crazy enough for ya'? Want me to take a shit on the floor?

Such a low life potty mouth. Marty redTed wrote:

Quoted text (8 lines)

> > You fucking retard...you never asked a question ! LOL. > Next. > > McMurphy: Is that crazy enough for ya'? Want me to take a shit on the > floor? > >

I guess they don;t have room for him in the Florida prison system (or he got the OJ jury) so he gets to walk once again.... Sad.... I won't even try to decipher his irrational twisted scibblings. Mitch -- "Don't pee an my leg then tell me it's raining" "redTed" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:449d50b7$0$860$[email hidden]... >> redTed wrote: >>>> I don't understand how invading Iraq did not scare these guys into not >>>> attacking us. Mitch said it would. >>> >>> Any chance you could just fuck off ? Please ? Like you promised . >>> Troll >> I see that you cannot answer the question. > > You fucking retard...you never asked a question ! LOL. > Next. > > McMurphy: Is that crazy enough for ya'? Want me to take a shit on the > floor? > >

"rex roland" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1Z3ng.26937$[email hidden]... |I don't understand how invading Iraq did not scare these guys into not | attacking us. Mitch said it would. First off, I don't believe all of these people were "Black-Americans". Three were and the rest were from somewhere else. All were Muslims, apparently. But the way I see this is that someone is trying to make Americans think this catch was a big deal, that the planners planned an imminent attack. The reality is that this was just a bunch of people, unrelated to any terrorist group, who were thinking about doing something, their main headquarters being their garage. I liken it to a bunch of seven year-olds planning a raid on the nearest apple tree. The American government just wants Americans to think that the billions of dollars spent on home security is being well spent, when in actuality the money is going into someone's pocket and is doing no good at all. Alanb

Sure Alan. And if the 9/11 terrorists were caught prior to the attack you and YOUR TYPE would have said the exact same thing. Its all a big conspiracy against YOU Rex and DGF. LOL. Mitch -- "Don't pee an my leg then tell me it's raining" "Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > > "rex roland" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:1Z3ng.26937$[email hidden]... > |I don't understand how invading Iraq did not scare these guys into not > | attacking us. Mitch said it would. > > First off, I don't believe all of these people were "Black-Americans". > Three were and the rest were from somewhere else. All were Muslims, > apparently. > > But the way I see this is that someone is trying to make Americans think > this catch was a big deal, that the planners planned an imminent attack. > The reality is that this was just a bunch of people, unrelated to any > terrorist group, who were thinking about doing something, their main > headquarters being their garage. > > I liken it to a bunch of seven year-olds planning a raid on the nearest > apple tree. > > The American government just wants Americans to think that the billions of > dollars spent on home security is being well spent, when in actuality the > money is going into someone's pocket and is doing no good at all. > > Alanb > >

"Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:NWmng.52536$[email hidden]... | Sure Alan. | | And if the 9/11 terrorists were caught prior to the attack you and YOUR TYPE | would have said the exact same thing. Its all a big conspiracy against YOU | Rex and DGF. LOL. | | Mitch | -- Yes, but that's the thing-- they weren't caught beforehand, because of the fact that it WAS the actual thing, not a bunch of kids planning some pipe dream while they played Gran Turismo. The government needs to show that they are doing something, so such a small-scale roundup of a bunch of kids has to be portrayed as some kind of major operation. I think it's pretty obvious that this plan was dreamed up in the imaginations of these kids, similar to the dream of a kid who imagines hitting a home-run to win the World Series. That doesn't mean that some foiled plots aren't serious plots. It's just that all plots are serious plots, when it comes to the government trying to convince the public that this War on Terror is actually making a difference. The way I see it, Homeland Security is a joke and a money-maker for those involved in providing the security. Alanb

I don't disagree with you on this point. Gravytrainriders do little good and cost way too much :) But thats typical in ANY government anywhere. Funny you mention this as Ive always considered you (and the entire left) as more of a commie/socialist type which by the sound of your statement makes little sense. More, bigger government that feels it needs to tell everyone everything daily. Elitism at its finest :) The republicans should take heed and get back to their roots. Less gov less restriction. Mitch -- "Don't pee an my leg then tell me it's raining" "Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > That doesn't mean that some foiled plots aren't serious plots. It's just > that all plots are serious plots, when it comes to the government trying > to > convince the public that this War on Terror is actually making a > difference. > The way I see it, Homeland Security is a joke and a money-maker for those > involved in providing the security. > > Alanb > > > >

"Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:junng.52844$[email hidden]... |I don't disagree with you on this point. Gravytrainriders do little good | and cost way too much :) But thats typical in ANY government anywhere. | | Funny you mention this as Ive always considered you (and the entire left) as | more of a commie/socialist type which by the sound of your statement makes | little sense. More, bigger government that feels it needs to tell everyone | everything daily. Elitism at its finest :) The republicans should take | heed and get back to their roots. Less gov less restriction. | I think you watch too much television. Alanb

Yes, and this SING OPERATION, serves to keep all the girly-boy right wingers shaking in there booties. Marty Alan Bernardo wrote:

Quoted text (25 lines)

> "rex roland" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > news:1Z3ng.26937$[email hidden]... > |I don't understand how invading Iraq did not scare these guys into not > | attacking us. Mitch said it would. > > First off, I don't believe all of these people were "Black-Americans". > Three were and the rest were from somewhere else. All were Muslims, > apparently. > > But the way I see this is that someone is trying to make Americans think > this catch was a big deal, that the planners planned an imminent attack. > The reality is that this was just a bunch of people, unrelated to any > terrorist group, who were thinking about doing something, their main > headquarters being their garage. > > I liken it to a bunch of seven year-olds planning a raid on the nearest > apple tree. > > The American government just wants Americans to think that the billions of > dollars spent on home security is being well spent, when in actuality the > money is going into someone's pocket and is doing no good at all. > > Alanb > >

People who think they are well informed by watching only FOX News television and listening to right wing talk radio are subjecting themselves to the constant fear mongering of a fascist US administration hell bent on preemptive war and picking our pockets to feed corporate profiteers. The last great Republican president tried to warn us. ----------------------------------- "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist." Dwight D. Eisenhower in his Farewell Address to the Nation on January 17, 1961 ----------------------------------------- Eisenhower was said to have originally intended to say 'military industrial CONGRESSIONAL complex' but changed it to keep from offending Congress where he gave the speech. Marty PS Try googling "Project for a New American Century" Mitch A wrote:

Quoted text (12 lines)

> I don't disagree with you on this point. Gravytrainriders do little > good and cost way too much :) But thats typical in ANY government > anywhere. > > Funny you mention this as Ive always considered you (and the entire > left) as more of a commie/socialist type which by the sound of your > statement makes little sense. More, bigger government that feels it > needs to tell everyone everything daily. Elitism at its finest :) The > republicans should take heed and get back to their roots. Less gov less > restriction. > > Mitch

That is to say... STING OPERATION. Marty_U wrote:

Quoted text (31 lines)

> Yes, and this SING OPERATION, serves to keep all the girly-boy right > wingers shaking in there booties. > > Marty > > Alan Bernardo wrote: >> "rex roland" <[email hidden]> wrote in message >> news:1Z3ng.26937$[email hidden]... >> |I don't understand how invading Iraq did not scare these guys into not >> | attacking us. Mitch said it would. >> >> First off, I don't believe all of these people were "Black-Americans". >> Three were and the rest were from somewhere else. All were Muslims, >> apparently. >> >> But the way I see this is that someone is trying to make Americans >> think this catch was a big deal, that the planners planned an imminent >> attack. The reality is that this was just a bunch of people, unrelated >> to any terrorist group, who were thinking about doing something, their >> main headquarters being their garage. >> >> I liken it to a bunch of seven year-olds planning a raid on the >> nearest apple tree. >> >> The American government just wants Americans to think that the >> billions of dollars spent on home security is being well spent, when >> in actuality the money is going into someone's pocket and is doing no >> good at all. >> >> Alanb >>

I really cant imagine how watching a few races and a few ballgames a week bears any relationship to what I said. And the saddest part is I *kinda* agreed with a tiny fraction of your gibberish. I think you smoke too much crack. Mitch -- "Don't pee an my leg then tell me it's raining" "Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > > I think you watch too much television. > > Alanb > >

Alan Bernardo wrote: > > Yes, but that's the thing-- they weren't caught beforehand, because of the > fact that it WAS the actual thing, not a bunch of kids planning some pipe > dream while they played Gran Turismo. > (...) ...while we play Rfactor. Which qualifies us as the sort that doesn't get caught beforehand :D Mr. Sylvestre (not a Gran Turismo player)

Nothing to answer. Wrong newsgroup. -Larry "rex roland" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:wL4ng.27073$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (7 lines)

> redTed wrote: >>> I don't understand how invading Iraq did not scare these guys into not >>> attacking us. Mitch said it would. >> >> Any chance you could just fuck off ? Please ? Like you promised . >> Troll > I see that you cannot answer the question.

"Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:RkMng.56674$[email hidden]...

Quoted text (8 lines)

|I really cant imagine how watching a few races and a few ballgames a week | bears any relationship to what I said. And the saddest part is I *kinda* | agreed with a tiny fraction of your gibberish. | | I think you smoke too much crack. | | Mitch | --

I can't see how firin' up a few bowls of ice a week bears any resemblance to what I said. Seriously, though, you talk just the way all the conservatives on television and the radio talk, so you must have been watching. Democrats typically feel the government should provide programs to help the needy and get them started; they generally don't think that bigger government is better. That's the conservatives' take on it, so that they can scare the public. And the public has fallen for it in the last two elections. But with control of both Houses of Congress, the Republicans have spent most of their time on financing the war, getting rid of gay marriages, and stopping flag burning. All that in six years! If Americans don't go to war, the war will come to us; if gays can marry, the world will end; and if flag burning is countenanced, lawlessness will ensue. All scare tactics. What a freakin' mess Bush and the Republicans have made of things. The Republicans had their chance: I suspect they will lose the House of Representatives next time 'round. Alanb

I watch little news on TV much to aggravating. Great minds just think alike. Homo's don;t deserve the same rights and privileges as a man and woman, period. They can do whatever they want behind closed doors but dont try and force that mess on the public which is exactly the GOAL of every homo activist since the dawning of the current age of political correctness. When a person disagrees youre instantly labeled a homophobe thus bringing down the wrath of the ACLU and every leftwing nutjob on the face of the earth. The truth sometimes hurts. Some people just need to be saved form themselves and their inability to make any kind of rational decision. If you listened to anything but Air America or Kos you would know the constitutional amendment is all about protecting the rest of America from the likes of Massachusetts. They will pass a state law and it will then become the law of the land and then every liberal judge in America will strike down the CURRENT STATE LAWS already on the books (in many states) thus rendering those states who's voters passed anti-gay marriage laws effectively mute. Activism at it's finest... You can offend me but I cant offend you eh? That my friend is the only REASON why it's even brought up. To save the USA from Massachusetts and it's band of fucking moronic retards. That tinfoil must be quite binding on your brain to think this was yet another vast right wing conspiracy against your people, rotflmao.... Im no republican and am against many things they do. A woman has a right to choose and the drug war has been the single biggest failure in the history of mankind. The last issue is far and away bipartisan though. BUT at least the repubs can defend us from the crazed islamists. The dems cant. Im all about personal responsibility which is the charter of the republicans. Im against big gov which is exactly what democrats want. This is why Im so dumbfounded the dems hate Bush so much. He talks conservative but walks like a liberal. That said at least he had the balls to do something about Iraq and the terrorists. Clinton would still be worried about his next BJ instead of Americas safety. Mitch -- "Don't pee an my leg then tell me it's raining" "Alan Bernardo" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]... > > "Mitch A" <[email hidden]> wrote in message > I can't see how firin' up a few bowls of ice a week bears any resemblance > to > what I said. > > Seriously, though, you talk just the way all the conservatives on > television > and the radio talk, so you must have been watching. Democrats typically > feel the government should provide programs to help the needy and get them > started; they generally don't think that bigger government is better. > That's the conservatives' take on it, so that they can scare the public. > > And the public has fallen for it in the last two elections. But with > control of both Houses of Congress, the Republicans have spent most of > their > time on financing the war, getting rid of gay marriages, and stopping flag > burning. All that in six years! If Americans don't go to war, the war > will > come to us; if gays can marry, the world will end; and if flag burning is > countenanced, lawlessness will ensue. All scare tactics. > > What a freakin' mess Bush and the Republicans have made of things. The > Republicans had their chance: I suspect they will lose the House of > Representatives next time 'round. > > Alanb > > >