Race Sim Central
Rec.Autos.Simulators Archive

Damper systems in GP4 (Don't work?)

2 posts by 1 person · 23 Jul 2006 20:10 UTC - 04 Aug 2006 19:17 UTC

Anand Nene 23 Jul 2006 20:10 UTC#10033
Started off with following assumptions for the damper settings: Front: ======= Increasing damper stiffness - Better traction - Poor response over the bumps Softening damper stiffness - Better front end grip Assumption: Softer the better; Rear: ====== Increasing damper stiffness - Reduced traction - Very good high speed corner stability Softening damper stiffness - Better traction - Very poor high speed corner stability Assumption: Harder the better; (Ofcourse varies with circuit) For bumpy surface, I selected Silverstone For high speed cornering, I chose Spa Test1 (Silverstone) ==================== Min Front dampers High to Max Rear dampers Expected: Ideal or nearly perfect driving setup for Silverstone Actual: As Expected Test2 (Silverstone) ==================== Max Front dampers Min Rear dampers Expected: Better turn in, but unstable over bumps. Actual: Nope, car feels absolutely the same as Test 1 Test3 (Spa) =========== Min Front dampers Min Rear dampers Expected: Difficulty at high speed cornering Actual: Nope, car feels absolutely OK! I am not sure about Test 3 though as I setup more rear wing to cut out the oversteer; Maybe that took care of the damper settings? Or maybe the car physics are not so sensitive to dampers? Anyone able to simulate this? S.ir Geoff Crammond around this space? :) Anand -- "Your lungs hit the back of your rib-cage... a double left-hander wrenching your neck off."
[07/24/2006 01:40 AM IST] Anand Nene wrote:
Quoted text (59 lines)> Started off with following assumptions for the damper settings: > > Front: > ======= > Increasing damper stiffness > - Better traction > - Poor response over the bumps > > Softening damper stiffness > - Better front end grip > > Assumption: Softer the better; > > Rear: > ====== > Increasing damper stiffness > - Reduced traction > - Very good high speed corner stability > > Softening damper stiffness > - Better traction > - Very poor high speed corner stability > > Assumption: Harder the better; (Ofcourse varies with circuit) > > For bumpy surface, I selected Silverstone > For high speed cornering, I chose Spa > > Test1 (Silverstone) > ==================== > Min Front dampers > High to Max Rear dampers > > Expected: Ideal or nearly perfect driving setup for Silverstone > Actual: As Expected > > Test2 (Silverstone) > ==================== > Max Front dampers > Min Rear dampers > > Expected: Better turn in, but unstable over bumps. > Actual: Nope, car feels absolutely the same as Test 1 > > Test3 (Spa) > =========== > Min Front dampers > Min Rear dampers > > Expected: Difficulty at high speed cornering > Actual: Nope, car feels absolutely OK! > > I am not sure about Test 3 though as I setup more rear wing > to cut out the oversteer; Maybe that took care of the damper > settings? > > Or maybe the car physics are not so sensitive to dampers? > > Anyone able to simulate this?
Anyone? Thanks Anand -- (Button overtakes Alonso)

Sponsors

Affiliate Links

Sim Gaming Expo MOZA Racing Sim-Lab Fanatec TrakRacer Asetek Internet Privacy From NordVPN Dreamhost Capital One Credit Card Application Fanatical CDKeys Amazon Amazon UK Project Motor Racing iRacing Get your racing gloves, boots and more from Demon Tweeks. Enlist at Roberts Space Industries, developers of Star Citizen and Squadron 42


Back from the ashes since July, 2019. First created in 2001 with the merger of Legends Central (founded 1999) and simracing.dk.

A site by a sort of sim racer, for sim racers, about racing sims. News and information on both modern and historic sim racing software titles.

All products and licenses property of their respective owners.


Facebook Threads Bluesky Twitter Mastodon Instagram YouTube Tiktok Twitch Reddit Google News Apple News Subscribe via WordPress Flipboard eBay

Race Sim Central © 1999-2026 | Some links pay RSC a commission. Advertising does not equal endorsement.Cookie Policy