rec.autos.simulators

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

Jeff Yo

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Jeff Yo » Mon, 29 Jun 1998 04:00:00


>SUBJECT: EXACT Analysis of the McLaren-Mercedes Technical Report MLM 3/98

Failing to type "theorem" correctly tends to cast doubt on the
accuracy of the rest of the work..

--
Jeff.         Ironbridge,  Shrops,  U.K.

 "-but as he was a York, I am rather inclined to suppose him a
       very respectable Man."
                     Jane Austen, The History of England

Marc J. Nelso

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Marc J. Nelso » Mon, 29 Jun 1998 04:00:00


> a=(2*4*9.81*800/(1.2*1.2*1.5))^ ? =170.5 m/s,
> b=1.2*1.2*1.5/(2*800)=0.00135 m^-1,  C1=arctg(75/170.5)=0.4144,

How many dozen cookies can one make from the above formula?

--

The Sim Project - http://www.simproject.com

* No animals were harmed in the making of this e-mail *
* To reply, change anti.spam.net to worldnet.att.net  *

PHendrix

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by PHendrix » Mon, 29 Jun 1998 04:00:00

Whoa!!! some people have WAAAAAY too much time on their hands

Andy

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Andy » Tue, 30 Jun 1998 04:00:00


>SUBJECT: EXACT Analysis of the McLaren-Mercedes Technical Report MLM 3/98
>Dear Friend,
>1. In the technical report MLM 3/98 is said that the McLaren-Mercedes's
have
>a power of 800HP (1HP=746watt), a Cx=0.95 and  Sx=1.5m2, in the slowest
>circuits (that implie more 'downforce') and that the nearest competitors,
the
>Ferrari's, have a power of 725HP, a Cx=1.2 and Sx=1.5m2, also in the
slowest
>circuits. Is also referred that the McLaren-Mercedes's have a 'braking
>power', with a full tank (m=800Kg) of -5g and the Ferrari's have a 'braking
>power' (with m=800Kg) of -4g.

Oh well, as I'm bored ....

Firstly where on earth did McLaren get the Ferrari data from?

Secondly, 'braking power' as you put it, per tyre is equal to the
coefficient of friction for the tyre * vertical load on the tyre. As the
coefficient (typically a max. of 1.4) drops only very slowly with increasing
vertical load, the ability of the tyres to decelerate the car is near enough
directly proportional to the vertical loading, which will be a combination
of car weight (there will be weight transfer from rear to front) and
aerodynamic downforce, which depends upon speed and wing settings (all of
which will be changed all weekend). So where is all this taken into account?
The 'braking force' figures you quote are constants, which make no sense.

<snip><snip><file under WPB>

I'll not waste bandwidth/time on the rest of this. Fortunately the guys at
Ferrari and McLaren *do* know what they are doing :-)

Andy.

Andy

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Andy » Tue, 30 Jun 1998 04:00:00

Sure they are ....

Andy.

Paul

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Paul » Tue, 30 Jun 1998 04:00:00


Good 'bikes, but they don't go round corners too well ;-)
--
Paul B

        'and I will make it a felony to drink small beer.'
        William Shakespeare, Henry VI part 2.

Laurence Lindstro

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Laurence Lindstro » Tue, 30 Jun 1998 04:00:00


> SUBJECT: EXACT Analysis of the McLaren-Mercedes Technical Report MLM 3/98

> Dear Friend,

    < Snip >

> Thank you for your attention.

> Bye. Adeus! Senna would say Chau!

> Z Fonseca
> Lisboa, Portugal.

   Ya know, that's what I was thinking.  

                                  Larry

Ronald Stoeh

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Ronald Stoeh » Tue, 30 Jun 1998 04:00:00



> >SUBJECT: EXACT Analysis of the McLaren-Mercedes Technical Report MLM 3/98

> Failing to type "theorem" correctly tends to cast doubt on the
> accuracy of the rest of the work..

Hey, smart ass! Let's hear your analasis in Portuguese! Geez!

I guess, if Schumacher gives an interview in English and makes a minor
mistake, you'll doubt his apillidy (ooops!) to drive his car?

l8er
ronny

--
Toys'R'Us '99: "So, would you like a hand gun with that action figure,
kiddo?"

          |\      _,,,---,,_        I want to die like my Grandfather,
   ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_              in his sleep.
        |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'     Not like the people in his car,
       '---''(_/--'  `-'\_)            screaming their heads off!

Christian Huebne

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Christian Huebne » Tue, 30 Jun 1998 04:00:00


> SUBJECT: EXACT Analysis of the McLaren-Mercedes Technical Report MLM 3/98

> Dear Friend,

> 1. In the technical report MLM 3/98 is said that the McLaren-Mercedes's have
> a power of 800HP (1HP=746watt), a Cx=0.95 and  Sx=1.5m2, in the slowest
> circuits (that implie more 'downforce') and that the nearest competitors, the
> Ferrari's, have a power of 725HP, a Cx=1.2 and Sx=1.5m2, also in the slowest
> circuits. Is also referred that the McLaren-Mercedes's have a 'braking
> power', with a full tank (m=800Kg) of -5g and the Ferrari's have a 'braking
> power' (with m=800Kg) of -4g.

McLaren have been boasting most horsepower for a long time. Yet
Hakkinen could not pass Irvine on the straight with 75 (!!) more
horsepower.

Oh, and Schumacher's mechanics were pushing his Ferrari around
the track to gain him 290km/h topspeed???

Dream on... I want to see the 2 sec in Silverstone and Hockenheim.

So in Your opinion Mika Hakkinen is the worst driver in F1? He
will be glad to know that.

I have read countless similiar calculations over the years. If
they are not backed by evidence on the track, they are
worthless. And Your calculation is backed by no evidence
whatsoever.

Christian Huebner

Andy Larde

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Andy Larde » Tue, 30 Jun 1998 04:00:00

Shame his understanding of vehicle dynamics doesn't match up to his English
.... :-)

Gary Da

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Gary Da » Tue, 30 Jun 1998 04:00:00

c>I have read countless similiar calculations over the years.

Fascinating.  A more relevant, and considerably less sophisticated
'calculation' would be to time how long it takes each team to change
a set of tyres and refuel.  I also wonder why they don't just
cut the driving part out of F1 altogether.  It would be a lot
cheaper, and no less exciting.

Micheal Smi

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Micheal Smi » Tue, 30 Jun 1998 04:00:00


>SUBJECT: EXACT Analysis of the McLaren-Mercedes Technical Report MLM 3/98

-huge snip-

Thanks for ruining my summer holidays...I thought I left all this
behind two months ago :).

Seriously though, where did you get this info?

Mike

Dillon Pyr

McLaren-Mercedes's ARE FASTER than Ferrari's. WHY?

by Dillon Pyr » Tue, 30 Jun 1998 04:00:00



> > =

> > a=3D(2*4*9.81*800/(1.2*1.2*1.5))^ =BD =3D170.5 m/s,
> > b=3D1.2*1.2*1.5/(2*800)=3D0.00135 m^-1,  C1=3Darctg(75/170.5)=3D0.4144,=

> How many dozen cookies can one make from the above formula?

African or European?  (here we go again  :-)

> -- =


> The Sim Project - http://www.simproject.com

> * No animals were harmed in the making of this e-mail *
> * To reply, change anti.spam.net to worldnet.att.net  *

--
dillon pyron

Hell hath no fury like root.

rec.autos.simulators is a usenet newsgroup formed in December, 1993. As this group was always unmoderated there may be some spam or off topic articles included. Some links do point back to racesimcentral.net as we could not validate the original address. Please report any pages that you believe warrant deletion from this archive (include the link in your email). RaceSimCentral.net is in no way responsible and does not endorse any of the content herein.